<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Windows 7 Center - Latest Comments in Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://windows7center.disqus.com/windows_7_beta_1_to_be_released_on_january_13_2009/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:26:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745829</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Joel, SHUT UP YOU NERD!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Knight</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:26:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745827</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That may make sence. The first PDC build was much older and probably had a little more testing before heading for the masses.&lt;br&gt;I suspect the Beta1 in Jan 09 will be much the same slightly older than current build at the time but alot better quality wise.&lt;br&gt;I cannot wait as it fixes one issue with some hardware I have under Vista which wont work to working fine under 7.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve-O</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:42:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745826</link><description>&lt;p&gt;6956 is actually more instable than 6801 for me. I've been getting weird GUI errors like blank spots on the screen&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">craz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:52:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745825</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can agree, I have the PDC build *oddly* from the PDC and installed it once I got back, and I must say everything runs and works fine. Not seen any issues with it yet and been using it as my main OS since then.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All installed and running with everything I had under Vista.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So for me I am happy that they (MS) are moving in the right direction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;S.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve-O</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:20:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745824</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lolwutislowltwt&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lowltu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fully Agree.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ron.paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:45:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The pre-beta build 6801 is even more stable than past beta builds for Vista or XP&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">craz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:27:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745821</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Probably piratebay ;) but rumors were up and around previously that it would be delivered via Windows Connect. I'll make sure to fill you guys in if that is the case but I would recommend signing up an account for now just in case&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">craz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:25:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745820</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hahaha&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:15:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;After a several months of trying to get on with Vista, I finally scaked it off and reverted back to XP, what a relief! I hope Windows 7 brings a lot more than it appears to be promising at the moment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;abbr&amp;gt;&lt;em&gt;800HighTech´s last blog post..&lt;a href="http://blog.800hightech.com/data-recovery-windows-xp-vista-linux-live-bootable-cd-external-hard-disk-drive/2916/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.800hightech.com/data-recovery-windows-xp-vista-linux-live-bootable-cd-external-hard-disk-drive/2916/"&gt;Access Your Data From Crashed Windows OS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;/abbr&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">800HighTech</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:12:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i was curious if anyone knows how an non msdn user can be accepted in the windows 7 beta. i would love to beta test the OS.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:08:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;omg - Are you guys really that dense? Don't you realize Mike made that mistake on purpose as a joke!? Wow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DiggaWatt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:15:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745817</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha, pwned. Mike you suck!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:00:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745816</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If that is the case, I hope they remove the debug processes from the release version of Vista because it still is slow as shinola.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">boe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:07:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haha, what did you think of his debate with Thor?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">craz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:57:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745814</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Previous digging leads me to believe that this would be offered via Microsoft Connect. But in these days, ThePirateBay seems like a very good option as well ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">craz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:57:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Some bloggers have been quick to criticize the pre-beta&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;hahaha, there is one person who did not get invited to the party at PDC 2008 and he was the only person who gave 7 a negative review at PDC&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SQLDenis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:37:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shucks!  I am in the end of a large project and cannot make those dates!   Is there any way to signup for the beta sans going?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeremy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:36:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745800</link><description>&lt;p&gt;its not like we are buying it anyways.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:33:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not to mention, build 6801 is probably the most stable we've ever seen out of all the betas in windows' history&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerry S</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:20:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to say that at least Microsoft are trying to do something about their release dates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If they can get it right, they'll shut a few detractors up. Only a few mind. Some people just love to hate them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiwi2008</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:16:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745804</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When was your last English class, Mike?  It's always been the rule that you're means you are and does not denote possession (as does your).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:12:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745803</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's just an improved interface..KDE4 is an entire Desktop Environment thats been roughly in development for the same amount of time as Windows 7 i think less. KDE4.2 is shaping up to be the best yes even better than windows 7 or GNOME - then i can't speak for Mac's - and thats plan to be release January 27 then brought to distribution's. KDE4.3 should appear a little after windows 7 is final and bring far more improvements.&lt;br&gt;So don't say windows is development is faster off this info. An entire desktop environment was built ground up in the time Windows 7's Vista improvement tweaks were done. You can consider them comparable i suppose.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pretty hacks? Most people who work on linux don't allow pretty hacks to stick around.&lt;br&gt;Also Linux does have a wonderful framework with C++/Qt(/KDE 4.x libs is wanted) ~ High paced efficient development.&lt;br&gt;Though what is lacked is tools for optimizing there are some for linux the best ones are on MacOSX though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheWindBlows</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:08:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has excellent dev tools these days so it's not surprising that they're getting agile with their products.&lt;br&gt;I really don't think Apple or Linux have the frameworks to keep up with Microsoft at this point. I'll admit I don't know much about either of them but it seems like a lot of pretty hacks on old systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vidalsasoon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:05:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Beta 1 to be released on January 13, 2009</title><link>http://windows7center.com/windows-7-news/windows-7-beta-1-to-be-released-on-january-13/#comment-5745805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Using apostrophe-s to pluralize abbreviations is technically acceptable, yes... But it's also considered old fashioned and illogical by many grammarians.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Note that I am not a grammar expert. I just play one on anonymous internet forums. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:53:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>